Filed under: News Presentations | Leave a Comment »
News presentation on for Monday, Nov 24
News presentation on Wednesday, Nov 19
Filed under: News Presentations | Leave a Comment »
And another one for discussion- on the brain drain
Read this.
So, what now? Boycott Shoppers Drug Mart to make a public statement? Although maybe they do make a point about trying to fulfil their domestic mission.
Filed under: General | Leave a Comment »
Media- discussion
This image got a lot of publicity, and won a Pulitzer Prize. It put Sudan on the map, as far as the regular public goes. Effecitve? Too drastic? Post thoughts below.
In a totally different vein, Oxfam’s video “The Luckiest Nut in the World” talks about how the Structural Adjustment Programs affected developing countries. It’s pretty much an advocacy video, and very well done. Thoughts? Does this constitute effective media-spread-awareness?
How would you compare the image to the video? Would you take into account different circumstances? Which one is more effective and why?
Filed under: General | 4 Comments »
News presentation on Monday, Nov 17
Filed under: News Presentations | Leave a Comment »
Dr. Orbinski talk- discussion
Since we are running short of class time, I thought we could have a discussion on Dr. Orbinski’s talk here. Did anyone want to talk about any of the points he brought up?
I think an excellent point was the effect of climate change on health care. It’s not something we discussed in class, but it is definitely something that is becoming more and more important.
If droughts are going to increase in the coming years, what immediate actions do we need to take to ensure basic needs such as food, water or healthcare. How does this change the role of organisations like the UN vs. organisations like MSF?
Feel free to post your own questions, thoughts and opinions.
Just as a reminder, posting here counts as participation mark in place of missing classes.
Filed under: General | 7 Comments »
Term Project Rubric- please post feedback
EDIT: The term project rubric has been edited under the Innovative Thought category to “supported from at least two intedisciplinary perspectives.”
Project Evaluation Form – HESO 449A/ F2008 Date: ___________
Evaluator’s Name: _____________________ TOPIC: ______________________________
| CRITERIA | Explanation | Grade | Comments |
| CONTENT | |||
| Objectives | Objectives are clearly communicated, and there is a clear thesis/argument/statement of topic early in the subject matter |
/ 10 |
|
| Link to course | A link to the theme of global health aid is clearly made |
/ 10 |
|
| Organization | The paper is well constructed, and there is a logical sequence and flow to the information presented |
/ 10 |
|
| Value of supporting evidence | Examples chosen to support the argument are well chosen, persuasive and directly applicable to the argument |
/ 10 |
|
| Evidence of research | Meets the requirement for number of external sources and academic sources |
/10 |
|
| Subject knowledge | Published and possible counter arguments are incorporated and dealt with to support the thesis. Overall good grasp of the subject matter is demonstrated |
/ 10 |
|
| CREATIVITY |
|
||
| Innovative thought | The argument is supported from at least two interdisciplinary perspectives |
/ 10 |
|
| Engaging and provocative | Paper incites further thought after reading is complete |
/ 10 |
|
| COMMUNICATION |
|
||
| Accessibility | Ideas are presented simply; complicated terms are well defined and/or footnoted |
/ 10 |
|
| Grammar and Coherence | Good syntax; minimal spelling errors |
/10 |
|
|
TOTAL |
/ 100 |
Positive Comment: __________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
Advice for improvement: _____________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________
Filed under: Administration and Introduction | 2 Comments »
News Presentations for Monday, November 24th
Filed under: News Presentations | Leave a Comment »
Guidelines for the Term Paper
Here are some guidelines for the paper:
- 8 to 12 pages long
- At least 7 references, with at least 3 academic sources
- Separate bibliography page
- Citation of all your claims
- Cover Page with Name, Topic and Student Number
- Don’t put your name/student number on every page as a header
- Use the Rubric to make sure you are matching all criteria
Filed under: Administration and Introduction | Leave a Comment »
News Presentation for Wednesday, October 29th
Filed under: News Presentations | Leave a Comment »
News Presentations- October 27th
Filed under: News Presentations | Leave a Comment »
