EDIT: The term project rubric has been edited under the Innovative Thought category to “supported from at least two intedisciplinary perspectives.”
Project Evaluation Form – HESO 449A/ F2008 Date: ___________
Evaluator’s Name: _____________________ TOPIC: ______________________________
| CRITERIA | Explanation | Grade | Comments |
| CONTENT | |||
| Objectives | Objectives are clearly communicated, and there is a clear thesis/argument/statement of topic early in the subject matter |
/ 10 |
|
| Link to course | A link to the theme of global health aid is clearly made |
/ 10 |
|
| Organization | The paper is well constructed, and there is a logical sequence and flow to the information presented |
/ 10 |
|
| Value of supporting evidence | Examples chosen to support the argument are well chosen, persuasive and directly applicable to the argument |
/ 10 |
|
| Evidence of research | Meets the requirement for number of external sources and academic sources |
/10 |
|
| Subject knowledge | Published and possible counter arguments are incorporated and dealt with to support the thesis. Overall good grasp of the subject matter is demonstrated |
/ 10 |
|
| CREATIVITY |
|
||
| Innovative thought | The argument is supported from at least two interdisciplinary perspectives |
/ 10 |
|
| Engaging and provocative | Paper incites further thought after reading is complete |
/ 10 |
|
| COMMUNICATION |
|
||
| Accessibility | Ideas are presented simply; complicated terms are well defined and/or footnoted |
/ 10 |
|
| Grammar and Coherence | Good syntax; minimal spelling errors |
/10 |
|
|
TOTAL |
/ 100 |
Positive Comment: __________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
Advice for improvement: _____________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________
Filed under: Administration and Introduction
What is the requirement for external and academic sources?
Within the Innovative Thought evaluation criteria, I’m not sure that it will always be appropriate / relevant to have a thesis supported from multiple interdisciplinary perspectives.